|
|
Home Inspection
|
The Problem with Partial Inspections
|
Frequently, we get the request in our office for a "partial"
inspection. This is another of those things that truly escapes my logic. While I
am sure that the basis for this request is the desire to reduce the expense of
the inspection, partial inspections are often a high-risk event for everyone
concerned. Let me explain by way of example.
The most common partial inspection request is the roof inspection. This is
due primarily to the high replacement cost of the roof and the probability of
extensive damage to the interior of the home should the roof fail.
Here's where the problems begin. Most folks assume that the roof inspection
takes place on the roof. It is true that walking on the roof is an important
element of the roof inspection. But, to really judge the past history and future
performance of the roof, the interior of the home as well as attic space should
also be inspected.
More often then not, roofs leak for quite some time into the attic before the
leak is detected in the interior living space. Some leaks begin so small that
for years the wood roof sheathing is kept wet and rotting. The water my also
have dripped onto wires causing corrosion and ductwork causing mold! How are
these additional discoveries disclosed in the context of the "partial"
inspection?
Get quotes from local service providers
|
|
|
To ignore them is clearly irresponsible; to disclose them is to surely expand
the inspection beyond its requested partial scope. In either scenario, it is
certain to create confusion and consternation. Had these initial symptoms of
problem been discovered and disclosed in the context of a full inspection it
would be a much simpler and more professional process to provide a clear and
complete picture for integration into the contract. Seldom are partial
inspections good for anyone in the transaction other then follow-up to the
initial full home inspection.
humor, insight, motivation, and real-world application.
|
|
|
|